Articles by "SOFTWARE"



In a bizarre development in an already strange story of Internet real estate and profit in the midst of a public health crisis, the owner of Ebola.com has sold the domain to a company called the Weed Growth Fund for a six-figure combination of cash and stock holdings that add up to just over $200,000.  
There are many layers to this murky transaction and all of them are strange. The payment for the domain was made by Weed Growth Fund in a combined $50,000 in cash and $164,000 in stock in Cannabis Sativa Inc., a marijuana company that sells medical and recreational products. Cannabis Sativa, which acquired a marijuana research company called Kush back in July, was originally a tanning salon business and is now run by libertarian former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson. Johnson recently suggested that marijuana should be explored as a potential Ebola treatment in an interview with Fox News.
The seller of Ebola.com, Jon Schultz—described by the Washington Post as "a cigarette thin man who will, upon request for a photograph, don a ruby robe and strike a regal pose"—is the owner of Blue String Ventures, which also owns H1N1.com and birdflu.com, among others. Schultz is a kind of speculator of disease-related Internet real estate; he bought Ebola.com six years ago for $13,500, and had previously said he thought $150,000 was a reasonable price for the domain. Schultz told CNBC he got the idea from the 1995 movie Outbreak.
On the buying side, the SEC filing for the transaction says Weed Growth Fund is a Nevada corporation, but Bloomberg's profile of the company says it is based in Birobidjan, Russia. Only a month ago, Weed Growth Fund was known as Ovation Research, and dealt primarily in stainless steel cookware distribution. Sections of the company's website detail the "Top 5 Advantages of Stainless Steel Cookware" ("Aesthetically pleasing"! "Does not harbor germs!"). Last month, the company changed its name to Weed Growth Fund through the Nevada Secretary of State. Until recently, Ovation Research Inc. operated as a subsidiary of the New Compedium Corporation, which in the past has been a major shareholder in a convoluted corporation whose owner is alleged to have ties to the Dominion of Melchizedek, widely believed to be a fake nation used in international banking fraud.
The timing of Ebola.com's shadowy sale is consistent with Jon Scultz's recent remarks that he wanted to sell soon in case the Ebola situation improved and reduced the site's value, telling the Post, “it’s something that could ameliorate and not be a big news story for that much longer.” Even though he's sold Ebola.com, Schultz believes he still has a trump card up his sleeve for the future—birdflu.com—backed with an alarming rationale. He says that domain is far more valuable because, unlike Ebola, bird flu has the potential for an airborn outbreak, a much more dire public health threat.

Chair Eric Schmidt rejects Julian Assange's allegations that Google worked with NSA
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/google-claims-it-installed-unbreakable-encryption-after-nsa-spying-1.2810773?cmp=rss
Google and privacy

The executive chairman of Google says the internet giant updated its encryption standards to make them unbreakable after learning the National Security Agency could spy on users.
Eric Schmidt rejected allegations made by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange that the search giant and the National Security Agency had been working together.

Schmidt said news of the widespread spying on citizens came as a shock to Google executives.

Lobbied Washington

“Not only were we shocked at the attacks by the NSA ...  on Google but as a result of those, we complained a great deal and we lobbied in Washington to get those behaviours stopped, which they have done,” Schmidt said in an interview with CBC’s The Exchange with Amanda Lang.
Cyberfile Google Interview 20141001
The executive chairman of Google, Eric Schmidt, spoke to Amanda Lang about online privacy and the culture inside Google. (Hannah Yoon/ Canadian Press)
“We’ve also now encrypted our data at rest and in transit with techniques that no one believes the NSA can break during our lifetime.”
Online privacy and internet security are hot-button issues for consumers, who over the past few years, have been treated to a stream of stories exposing how little privacy they have. Governments are charged with protecting civil rights while simultaneously detecting homegrown terrorism.
In his new book When Google met WikiLeaks, Assange said Google had been selling search services to the NSA since 2002 and had collected personal data from millions of users.
"It is formally part of the defence industrial base," Assange told CBC Radio's Q last week. "Further, this close connection between Google's business activities, a business model which it can't get away from, and the U.S. government created an opportunity for the National Security Agency to sink its fangs into everything that Google was collecting."

 NSA spying: Obama announces limits on surveillance program

 Schmidt rejected Assange’s claims, saying Google changed its encryption protocols in 2013, when former NSA contractor Edward Snowden revealed that British intelligence officials were intercepting Google data.

Take it to court

Schmidt said Google will only reveal data if presented with a proper legal subpoena.
“Well in American law there is something called the Patriot Act so if there is a proper court of law request that we must honour, we do,” he said.
“We recently published a list of the number of requests we get and it's about 10,000 a year which is a minuscule number compared to the number of activities that are going on, so we do occasionally have to respond to those but we do that through a normal legal process and not through some backdoor surveillance process,” he said.
Schmidt admits Google is a fan of big data and sees it as a pathway to technological breakthroughs in future in fields such as medicine.
And while it makes money selling ads geared to its users, Google claims there is a separation between building its products and monetizing them.
“We have very strong rules about this but again it goes back to this principle of focusing on the user,” Schmidt said.
“We don't want to do things that users aren't going to be comfortable with. We have a long-standing statement, or rules of service, we're also highly regulated in these areas.”

Geezwild

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget