Dilma Rousseff favourite in Brazil’s presidential election runoff
Workers’ party
candidate and incumbent president Dilma Rousseff greets supporters at a
rally in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Photograph: Felipe Dana/AP
From the Amazon forest to the streets of São Paulo, Brazil began voting for a president on Sunday, with polls indicating the incumbent, Dilma Rousseff, would be re-elected for a second four-year term on the basis of her record in tackling inequality.
But after one of the closest and most unpredictable campaigns in recent memory, the pro-business challenger, Aécio Neves, maintained an outside chance of ending the 12-year rule of Rousseff’s Workers’ party.
Two polls on the eve of the vote showed the Social Democratic party
candidate had slightly narrowed the president’s lead. Datafolha put
Rousseff on 47% against Neves on 43%. The other main survey firm, Ibope,
reported a gap of six percentage points.
Anything other than a Rousseff win would be a surprise, but there
have been plenty of those in a dramatic race that has seen erratic
swings of voting intentions and divergences between poll predictions and
results.
Before the first round of voting earlier this month,
Neves was lagging in third place for weeks but won one of the two
runoff spots with a late surge. The polls, it turned out, had
underestimated Neves’s support by about 10 percentage points.
The 143 million voters have appeared divided – and confused – by an
often filthy campaign that has been characterised by name-calling during
presidential debates, accusations of corruption, nepotism and
incompetence, rumour-mongering on social networks and suspicious delays
in the release of government data on deforestation and poverty.
Aécio Neves, Social Democratic party candidate, after voting in the Brazilian presidential election run-off in Belo Horizonte.Photograph: Washington Alves/Reuters
The overwhelmingly anti-Rousseff mainstream media have focused on a huge and unfolding bribes-for-votes scandal in which kickbacks from the country’s biggest company, Petrobras,
were used to buy off politicians and fill campaign coffers. A report in
Veja magazine this week claimed Rousseff and her predecessor, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, were aware of the wrongdoing, a charge they deny.
Neves has made this the focus of his appeal to voters seeking change.
“There’s one measure above all others to end corruption … vote the PT
[Workers’ party] out of office,” he said during the final televised
debate.
The Workers’ party has responded with a string of attacks. It has
claimed Neves is guilty of corruption by building an airport on his
family’s land, of nepotism by adding half a dozen cousins and relatives
to the public payroll during his time as governor of Minas Gerais state,
and of disrespecting women – an allusion to a report widely circled on
social networks that he punched his wife before they were married. Neves
and his wife deny the allegations, but this failed to stop his support
plunging among female voters.
The name-calling has been no more edifying. Neves compared Workers’
party campaign manager João Santana to the Nazi propaganda chief Joseph
Goebbels. In response, Lula da Silva said the Social Democrats
persecuted the poor north-east region of Brazil in the same way the
Nazis maltreated the Jews, and that Neves, whom he has described as a
drunk and a playboy, was as intolerant as King Herod.
Amid all the flying mud, it has often been hard to discern a clear
difference in policies. To win votes both candidates have moved to the
middle ground. Nonetheless, this is a classic left-right contest
between a society-focused president and an economy-oriented challenger.
Rousseff, who was a Marxist guerrilla during her student years, has
pledged to build on her government’s success in reducing inequality and
to strengthen management of the economy, which has been in the doldrums
for the past few years. Neves, whose grandfather was the first president
elected after the dictatorship, promises a more results-oriented and
efficient administration which would make life easier for businesses
through tax changes and a more streamlined bureaucracy, but he too would
maintain the bolsa familia social allowance programme and continue efforts to reduce poverty.
Rousseff is dominant in the north-east. Neves, the favourite of
global financial markets, is more popular among middle-class urbanites.
But whoever wins will have to make further compromises to secure
alliances in the fractious Congress.
After all the rancour, voting appeared to be taking place calmly on
Sunday. The only question was whether, after the drama of the past few
months, this election could throw up one last twist.
Post a Comment