Amber Vinson’s blood tested negative for Ebola virus just nine days after she was first diagnosed. Her fellow nurse, Nina Pham, is now in good condition.
The two nurses infected when they treated the first person diagnosed with Ebola in the United States, Thomas Eric Duncan,
have seemingly fared better than most patients with the disease. Is
that thanks to early treatment, did the two nurses just get a smaller
dose of the virus to start with, or are other factors at work?
Doctors familiar with
Ebola say it’s almost impossible to know. Only seven people have ever
been treated for Ebola in the United States. Six recovered and only
Duncan died. Even with such small numbers it’s a stark contrast to the epidemic in Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea, where the World Health Organization says 70 percent of patients are dying.
“It is rare that
recovery happens this fast,” said Thomas Geisbert, an expert on
infectious diseases and Ebola treatment at the University of Texas
Medical Branch. “It could be related to a number of things including the
fact that these patients were diagnosed in the U.S. and treatment was
presumably initiated quickly,” he told NBC News.
But even in Africa, with late and
minimal treatment, some people do pull through, says Kathryn Jacobsen, a
George Mason University epidemiologist who has seen it first hand in
Bo, in Sierra Leone.
“While most people who
contract Ebola virus become severely ill, some people have relatively
mild infections,” Jacobsen told NBC News. “It is not possible in this
case to know whether the infected nurse had a speedy recovery because of
early medical interventions or because she happened to be someone with
an immune system that allowed her to fight the infection relatively
quickly.”
But groups such as
Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF or Doctors Without Borders) say they have
found that when people are diagnosed fast and get treatment quickly,
even with the limited facilities available in West Africa the death rate
can be lowered measurably.
“Early medical
intervention is likely to be associated with a better outcome. One of
the continuing challenges in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone is that
there are too few hospital beds available for Ebola patients,” Jacobsen
said. “Home-based care is sometimes the only option available to people
infected with Ebola in West Africa, and that generally means having no
access to IV fluids, oxygen, or antibiotics for secondary bacterial
infections, which are all therapies that improve Ebola survival rates.”
What beds are available go to the sickest patients, meaning early treatment just doesn’t happen.
In Africa, the
treatment’s almost completely supportive, and patients often cannot even
be given saline to replace lost fluids. Doctors who treated Dr. Kent Brantly
at Emory University Hospital say they found he had almost cholera-like
symptoms, with severe diarrhea causing loss of important compounds
called electrolytes, which are important for heart, nerve and other
organ function.
They felt that
measuring and precisely replacing these electrolytes made a big
difference. Brantly also got what’s called convalescent serum — blood taken for an Ebola survivor — as well as an experimental drug called ZMapp.

Post a Comment