By Jonathan Stempel
Former drug executive Martin Shkreli faces a new
legal headache, a lawsuit claiming that his $2 million Wu-Tang Clan
album contains illustrations ripped off from a New York artist, who now
wants Shkreli to pay for them.
In a complaint filed on Tuesday in Manhattan federal
court, Jason Koza said he never allowed his fan art depicting Wu-Tang
members to be used in packaging for the hip-hop group's "Once Upon a
Time in Shaolin," the sole copy of which Shkreli bought.
Shkreli has bragged that he had no plans to listen to the album, but bought it to "keep it from the people".
The 32-year-old is also known for sparking outrage
last year among patients, doctors and politicians after his former
company Turing Pharmaceuticals raised the price of the anti-parisitic
infection drug Daraprim by more than 5,000 percent.
Koza, 34, of Copiague, New York, said he thought his nine works would appear only on the website WuDisciples.blogspot.com.
But the Fashion Institute of Technology graduate now
blames Wu-Tang leader Robert "RZA" Diggs for including them in the
"Shaolin" album, and Shkreli for allowing three works depicting
Inspectah Deck, Ol' Dirty Bastard and Raekwon to accompany a January 29
article at Vice.com.
"Mr
Koza was happy when his work appeared on the website," the complaint
said. "Mr. Koza never granted a license for his works to be copied or
displayed anywhere [else]".
Other defendants include Paddle8, which auctioned the album, and Wu Tang-affiliated producer Tarik "Cilvaringz" Azzougarh.
Koza
said Cilvaringz has acknowledged the infringement, asking in a January
31 email, "if you want to skype discussing the use of your drawings.
Thanks bro".
Benjamin Brafman, a lawyer for
Shkreli, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Wu-Tang
and Paddle8 did not immediately respond to similar requests.
Last
Thursday, Shkreli invoked his constitutional right against
self-incrimination at a House Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform hearing on drug pricing, and later tweeted that lawmakers in
Congress were imbeciles. He also faces separate federal securities fraud
charges.
Koza is seeking unspecified damages plus profits stemming from copyright infringement.
His
lawyer Peter Scoolidge said in a phone interview that Shkreli "didn't
need to know" the illustrations were protected to be liable. "There is
no intent requirement for copyright infringement," he said.
Reuters
Post a Comment